|
CONDITIONS
ARE ALWAYS GREAT AT MARKET TOPS!
Write it down.
Engrave it in stone, or at least into the
wall. ‘Surrounding conditions always look
great at market tops!’
My mail has
been particularly heavy in recent weeks,
mostly along the lines of “How can you
possibly be bearish on the stock market and
expecting a sharp decline to a low in
October? Is your head in the sand? Don’t you
see how strong the economy is, how strong
corporate earnings are? Don’t you realize
how tame inflation is, how confidently
consumers are spending?”
Sure I do. I
hear it every day from Wall Street.
The problem is
that not much of the current bullish case
has anything at all to do with what is
actually bullish (or bearish) for the stock
market at its tops and bottoms.
I devoted half
of my 1999 book Riding the Bear – How to
Prosper in the Coming Bear Market, to
pointing out that if investors are to break
the historical pattern of being excited and
buying heavily at market tops, and depressed
and selling out at market lows, they need to
at least learn the most basic attribute of
the market; that conditions at market tops
always look great, and at market bottoms
always look horrible.
After the
economy and stock market have been in a
serious decline for awhile, obviously
conditions become increasingly dismal, with
the economy slowing, corporate earnings in
decline, and consumers more and more
pessimistic. By the time the market reaches
its ultimate low, and is ready to begin its
next big rally or bull market, those
conditions are at an extreme of bleakness.
Think recession, woeful corporate earnings,
dismal forecasts by analysts and corporate
managements, low consumer confidence and
spending, demoralized investors. Those will
always be the conditions at stock market
lows.
However, after
that low is in, the economy and the stock
market begin to rise again, often prodded
along by a friendly Federal Reserve cutting
interest rates, and increased federal
spending to get the economy stimulated
again. The early stage at the bottom is also
the denial stage for public investors. No
way could a new bull market begin with such
dismal surrounding conditions. Those who are
buying, primarily insiders and institutions,
are wrong. The market will soon reverse to
the downside again, and hit even lower lows.
But as the
economy and stock market continue to rise,
more investors begin to lose some of their
fear and dip their toes in, and the rally
and new bull market continue. It is during
this period that news of stronger economic
conditions and rising corporate earnings are
meaningful. Stocks are still undervalued.
Investors are still too pessimistic.
Technically, the market still has a long way
to go before it will become overbought.
But eventually,
the bull market runs its course. (The
average bull market lasts about three years,
the unusual bull markets of the 1920s and
1990s being the exceptions). Stocks become
too highly priced. The economy has been
strong long enough to create extreme
conditions, perhaps an unreasonable bubble
in investment prices, excessive risk-taking
and speculation, high debt levels, high
energy costs. Perhaps conditions have even
become so strong that the Federal Reserve is
concerned, and has begun to raise interest
rates to cool things off.
At that point in
the cycle, continuing strength in economic
numbers and corporate earnings are
meaningless. They are just part of the great
surrounding conditions at market tops. Don’t
try to tell me why this time is different.
I’ve heard it all before, in 1987, in 1989,
in 2000. The history is clear.
The fact is that
the stock market always tops out before the
surrounding conditions turn sour. The most
recent example was the way the Dow topped
out in January of 2000, but the economy and
corporate earnings remained so strong that
the Federal Reserve was still raising
interest rates four months later in May of
2000, in its efforts to get the economy
cooled down.
Yet, once
extreme conditions that indicate a top are
in place, be they bubbles in an investment
area, high consumer debt, insider selling,
extremes of investor bullishness, overbought
stock prices, unfavorable seasonality, or
whatever, it still takes a catalyst to
actually top the market out.
The two most
common historically, have been rising
interest rates, and rising energy costs.
Rising interest
rates have topped out more markets than any
other single factor. Why? Because rising
interest rates are a sure sign of an economy
that has gone so far it has created excesses
that have even the Federal Reserve concerned
and raising rates in an effort to get things
cooled off. (The Fed has now raised rates
ten times since June of last year, and
interestingly enough, strong earnings and
economic numbers or not, the market has gone
nowhere since. It has been in a very narrow
trading range, in which, even with the Dow
again near the top of the range, it is still
only 1% higher than its level of June,
2004). In spite of all the euphoria among
public investors, someone has already been
selling heavily enough to offset their
buying.
The second
historical market-topping catalyst has been
high energy costs. There has never been a
time when sharply rising oil prices did not
eventually top out the economy, corporate
earnings, and the stock market. Don’t tell
me the bull’s story that obviously the
market doesn’t mind high oil prices this
time, since it hasn’t topped out - yet. Or
has it?
But above all,
don’t tell me the market won’t top out
because the economy and earnings remain
strong. That is not how the market works. It
tops out before the economy, before
earnings, and while conditions have
consumers confident and investors optimistic
that this time will be different.
Sy Harding |